Inside the evolving world of porous plastics (and why a little conductive yarn suddenly matters)
If you’ve been following filtration and advanced materials, you’ve seen a quiet convergence: plastics engineered for precise porosity meeting textiles tuned for static control. A seasoned buyer I spoke with called it “filters getting smart.” That’s why I paid attention to this plastic porous filters company from Shijiazhuang, China (Rm. C-1301, Hyde Park Plaza, No. 66 Yuhua W. Road, 050056)—they’re shipping sintered polyethylene filters one day and conductive blended spun yarn the next. Odd combo? Actually, it makes sense: dust-collection filter bags and sensor housings increasingly need antistatic or EMI-friendly layers.

Product spotlight: Conductive Blended Spun Yarn
The company’s Conductive Blended Spun Yarn is a metallic/functional blend designed for electromagnetic shielding, anti-static, and general conductive purposes. In practice, it’s used to stitch or weave into ESD-safe filter bags, sensor wraps, and even cable sleeves. Many customers say the blend uniformity is the standout—less striping, more consistent surface resistance along the length.
| Parameter | Typical Value (≈, real-world use may vary) |
|---|---|
| Composition | Polyester/cotton base with conductive metallic fibers |
| Denier / Yarn Count | 150D–600D (customizable) |
| Surface Resistance (ASTM D257) | 10^2–10^5 Ω/sq |
| Shielding Effectiveness | 20–35 dB @ 30 MHz–1 GHz (IEC/IEEE methods) |
| Blend Uniformity (CV%) | ≤ 3.0% typical |
| Operating Temp. | -20 to 120 °C (application-dependent) |
Process flow and testing: from porous PE to ESD-ready assemblies
Materials: PE, PP, UHMWPE, PTFE, and PVDF for porous filters; conductive metallic/antistatic fibers for the yarn. Methods: powder classification → cold isostatic pressing → sintering (for plastics) or carding/spinning → twisting (for yarn). Testing follows ASTM F316 (bubble point/porosity), ISO 16889 multipass (liquid filtration), ISO 11171 (particle counter calibration). For ESD/EMI: ASTM D257 surface resistivity and IEC 61340-5-1 handling rules. Service life? In dust-collection bags, users report 18–36 months; in liquid vents, 6–24 months depending on chemistry and CIP cycles.
Applications
- Water and solvent filtration (20–90 μm pores; ISO 16889 verified media)
- Medical devices and diagnostics (biocompatible grades; ISO 13485 lines available)
- Battery vents and fuel line breathers (chemically resistant PP/PTFE)
- Dust-collection filter bags with antistatic yarn stitched in (NFPA-conscious plants)
- Electronics packaging, EMI wraps, sensor shielding (with the conductive blend)
Why this plastic porous filters company is getting shortlists
- Tight porosity control; measured via ASTM F316 bubble point and gas flux
- ESD layer integration—conductive yarn supplied in matching deniers
- Certs: ISO 9001, with options for ISO 13485, RoHS/REACH compliance
- Flexible MOQs, custom shapes (sintered discs, rods, sheets) and yarn specs
Vendor comparison (snapshot)
| Vendor | Min Pore Size | ESD Yarn Resistivity | Lead Time | Certifications |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chinaporousfilters | ≈ 10 μm | 10^2–10^5 Ω/sq | 2–4 weeks | ISO 9001, RoHS/REACH |
| Vendor A (Importer) | ≈ 20 μm | 10^4–10^7 Ω/sq | 4–6 weeks | ISO 9001 |
| Vendor B (EU) | ≈ 15 μm | 10^3–10^6 Ω/sq | 3–5 weeks | ISO 9001/14001 |
Field notes and mini case studies
- Pharma vent filter: switching to sintered UHMWPE (30 μm) cut clogging by ~22% per ISO 16889 multipass tests; operators noted steadier ΔP.
- Flour mill baghouse: antistatic filter bags using the conductive yarn reduced nuisance sparks to zero incidents over 9 months, per IEC 61340 audits.
Feedback is candid: “Lead times weren’t fancy, but the porosity consistency saved our QC hours,” one engineer told me. To be honest, that’s what most buyers want—predictability.
Customization and QA
Options include pore size tuning (10–120 μm), thickness and geometry (discs, tubes, plates), thermal welding or CNC slicing, plus yarn denier, twist, and cone size. Each lot can ship with ASTM F316 bubble-point data, D257 resistivity logs, and RoHS/REACH statements. I guess that checks the regulatory box for most plants.
References
- ASTM F316 – Standard Test Methods for Pore Size Characteristics of Membrane Filters by Bubble Point and Mean Flow Pore Test.
- ISO 16889 – Hydraulic fluid power filters—Multi-pass method for evaluating filtration performance.
- IEC 61340-5-1 – Electrostatics: Protection of electronic devices from electrostatic phenomena.
- ASTM D257 – Standard Test Methods for DC Resistance or Conductance of Insulating Materials.
- ISO 9001 / ISO 13485 – Quality management systems standards.
POROYAL is dedicated to the research and development of powder sintered porous filter technology, establishing itself as a leading innovator in advanced porous material solutions.Titanium and plastic filters POROYAL engineers deliver high-value engineering solutions to address complex product design challenges across diverse industries, including petrochemical, oilfield, water treatment, food & beverage, pharmaceutical, chemical processing, medical devices, vacuum conveying, and other specialized applications.Metal porous filter Our expertise encompasses comprehensive liquid-solid and gas-solid separation technologies tailored to meet customer-specific requirements.At POROYAL, we function as an integrated enterprise comprising four specialized divisions—dedicated to the development of Metal Sintered Porous Filters, Plastic Sintered Porous Filters, Metal Fibers, and Medical & Laboratory filtration solutions. Metal Porous Filters Manufacturer
Through collaborative innovation, we engineer sustainable technologies that enhance performance, optimize efficiency, and deliver measurable success for our customers.China Plastic Porous Filtersr|super blog